Condition breach
A visa holder has breached a condition imposed on the visa. Common examples: Condition 8105 (48-hour rule), Condition 8202 (maintenance of enrolment), or unauthorised employment on a visitor visa.
Unlike Section 501 which focuses on character, Section 116 covers a wide range of situations where a visa can be cancelled based on the visa holder's circumstances or conduct. This page explains the main grounds, the process, and how to appeal via the ART.
Knowing which ground applies shapes your response.
A visa holder has breached a condition imposed on the visa. Common examples: Condition 8105 (48-hour rule), Condition 8202 (maintenance of enrolment), or unauthorised employment on a visitor visa.
The visa holder provided incorrect information or documents in their application or in subsequent dealings with the Department. Often triggers PIC 4020 consequences.
The basis on which the visa was granted no longer exists. An employer sponsored visa where employment has ended, or a partner visa where the relationship has ended.
The Department has identified that the visa was granted when the applicant did not actually meet the criteria. Can arise from later-discovered information.
Various specific grounds set out in Migration Regulations that apply to particular visa types.
Section 116 cancellation follows a defined process. Understanding each stage matters.
Tip-offs, data matching, audit processes, or the visa holder's own disclosures.
The visa holder's opportunity to address concerns. A properly prepared response often prevents cancellation.
Department decides. If cancellation proceeds, the visa holder is notified of grounds and review rights.
When a response addresses the specific concerns with evidence and mitigating circumstances, the Department frequently decides not to proceed with cancellation. This is why deadline compliance for NOICC responses is critical.
For any Section 116 matter, book with Sourabh Aggarwal or Prateek Maan.