Section 351
Applies to most migration decisions. Minister has discretion to substitute a more favourable decision for an ART decision.
The Minister for Immigration has discretionary power to substitute a more favourable decision in exceptional cases. Requests are not common and not often successful. Our Immigration Lawyer Prateek Maan leads these submissions.
Sections 351 and 417 of the Migration Act empower the Minister to substitute a more favourable decision for the ART in specific circumstances.
Applies to most migration decisions. Minister has discretion to substitute a more favourable decision for an ART decision.
Applies to protection visa decisions. Similar discretionary power reserved for refugee and complementary protection matters.
The Minister is not required to consider intervention requests and is not required to grant intervention. There is no right to a response.
Intervention is not an appeal pathway. It is an extraordinary remedy reserved for cases that fall outside normal decision-making frameworks.
The Minister's guidelines identify specific categories. Cases outside these rarely succeed.
Intervention submissions are complex. They succeed on structure and evidence, not volume.
Clear presentation of why the case falls outside normal migration decision-making. Engagement with the Minister's intervention guidelines and statutory framework.
Medical, family, psychological, character, and compliance evidence. Evidence that the applicant has complied with Australian law and is of good character.
Evidence of the impact on Australian family members, children, and the broader community if intervention is not granted.
The exact numbers vary by year and Minister, but historically fewer than 10% of intervention requests succeed. This reflects the exceptional nature of the power. It is not a routine pathway. But for the right case, it can be the only remaining option and sometimes produces life-changing results.
For intervention submissions, book with our Immigration Lawyer Prateek Maan.