Substantive visa expired first
Lodging after your substantive visa expired, even by one day, produces a BVC not a BVA.
Or you have been on a chain of bridging visas for two years waiting on an ART review. Or your partner visa was refused, you appealed, won, and started again. The bridging visa you receive now is not a BVA, it is a BVC. A BVC carries restrictions the BVA never had.
If you held a substantive visa at the moment you lodged, you get a BVA. If you did not, you get a BVC.
Lodging after your substantive visa expired, even by one day, produces a BVC not a BVA.
Lodging after an ART appeal where the substantive visa had ended during the tribunal process.
Lodging under Section 48 bar exceptions typically produces a BVC. See exception guide.
Lodging after a departure and re-entry on a visitor visa that has since ended.
A BVC is granted with condition 8101 by default. No work of any kind. No travel.
The Department applies a no reasonable means of support test. Hardship means you genuinely cannot meet basic living costs.
Bank statements showing low balances. Tenancy and utility bills. Medical and insurance costs. Dependents and their needs. Family statements on inability to support.
Not inconvenience. Not lifestyle reduction. Not reluctance to rely on family. A bank balance of $20,000 will not meet hardship. The bar is real financial distress.
Typically 4 to 8 weeks. Urgent cases (eviction, medical) can be expedited with evidence. Work rights are not backdated. They apply from grant date forward.
Timing and sequencing matter. Get this wrong and you chain unfavourable bridging visas for years. The new application, if lodged while the BVC is in effect, usually generates another BVC. Expert advice before lodging matters.
For BVC strategy, book with Sourabh Aggarwal.